Torture

CIA Lawyers Up About Torture

The CIA has refused to release further documents related to its controversial terrorist rendition, detention and interrogation programs, saying doing so would threaten national security.

In other words, they lawyered up and pled the fifth on the grounds that it would incriminate them.

You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney present during questioning. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you. Do you understand these rights?

Oh, if only they had given the thousands of innocent prisoners they tortured these very same rights.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090902/pl_afp/usattacksciaintelligenceprobe

Ministry:Truth
Torture
War Crimes

Comments (0)

Permalink

CIA Inspector General’s Report on Torture

Short version: yes, we did.

Longer version:

What we did included the deaths of at least a hundred prisoners, fake executions, threats to kill the family of prisoners, threats to rape the family of prisoners, buttstroking with rifles and knee kicks, dislocated shoulders, induced hypothermia, pressure points on carotid artery,

And waterboarding. That thing we convicted Japanese WW2 war criminals for doing.

Of the approximately one-thousand prisoners who went through Guantanamo, the US government has admitted that the vast majority of them were innocent. About 800 were eventually released without any charges, let alone a trial, or due process of any kind.

Attorney General Eric Holder has announced the most cowardly approach to investigating the obvious war crimes: a “preliminary review” that accepts the guidance from Bush’s DOJ as legal and Holder, that great example of courage that he is, is only going to investigate whether anyone exceeded that illegal guidance. Bush’s DOJ memos advocated torture that violates the Geneva Convention on multiple levels. But Holder doesn’t want to investigate that at all. Instead, Holder wants to use an Abu Ghraib model of investigation which will pursue only the low-level people in the trenches and ignore the obvious evidence that goes all the way up the chain of command directly to the President of the United States.

Cowards all.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/08/24/ig_report/index.html

http://luxmedia.vo.llnwd.net/o10/clients/aclu/IG_Report.pdf

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/08/25/king/index.html

Ministry:Truth
Torture

Comments (0)

Permalink

Obama’s Very First Rendition and Torture

(that we know of)

Raymond Azar, a 45-year-old Lebanese construction manager with a grade school education, is employed by Sima International, a Lebanon-based contractor that does work for the U.S. military in Iraq and Afghanistan. He also has the unlikely distinction of being the first target of a rendition carried out on the Obama watch.

And apparently, he was tortured in American custody.

I thought we all “learned our lesson” about torture? I thought we were never going to torture again? What about the international backlash that will endanger American lives?

Enough is enough. Release the photos. Prosecute the law breakers. Stop endangering American lives.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/11/target-of-obama-era-rendi_n_256499.html

Torture
War Crimes

Comments (0)

Permalink

Endangering American Lives

The US has a bunch of photos of prisoners held by Americans being tortured. The Bush administration and now the Obama administration are arguing that these photos cannot be released because they will create international backlash and cause terrorists to attack Americans.

Let’s assume for the moment, that this backlash argument is true. Let’s assume that these photos are never released. Let’s assume that the American Government is able to torture prisoners for years, including killing at least 100 of them, and are never prosecuted for those crimes.

Are we saying that these Americans who authorized, ordered, and executed the torturing of prisoners have learned their lessons? That they’ll never do it again? Are we saying that the US Government will never again overstep its bounds?

Because if the government did NOT learn it’s lesson, if the people who authorized, ordered, and executed the torture of prisoners are simply waiting to torture again, then doesn’t that mean there could be another torture incident? Maybe more photographs that will have to be suppressed because it will create an international backlash that could kill Americans?

Obama is currently working on a way transfer prisoners from Guantanamo but keeping them in a due-process-free zone identical to Guantanamo. He’s working on a way to imprison people without due process, who have not committed a crime, indefinitely and without recourse to law.

We still have massive domestic spying going on. We still have a massive chunk of rights ripped up and thrown to the ground.

And now Obama is looking to ramp up the military presence in Afghanistan, from 30,000 troops when he got into office to 120,000 by the end of his first year in office.

This is the same Afghanistan where CIA predator drones have repeatedly killed Afghan civilians, Afghan civilians at wedding parties. This is the same Afghanistan where Afghan General Abdul Rashid Dostum working with our military and paid by the CIA committed a massive attrocity of killing some 2,000 prisoners by suffocating them in container trucks.

Are we really saying that the US government will stop committing attrocities that will create international backlash? Are we really saying that these torture photos are the only ones we have to worry about?

If backlash is the true concern here, then the long view is that we must make sure that these incidents stop. Because if the US government continues to violate humanitarian laws and cause incidents that generate international backlash that threatens American lives, then we’re in for serious trouble in the long term.

And how do we make sure the US government does NOT commit more attrocities in the future? How do we prevent more backlash in the future? We have been given two options: (A) Bury the evidence or (B) Air the evidence and prosecute those who violated the law.

If we bury the evidence, that may reduce the backlash from that one particular incident. But it enboldens the government to continue its behaviour of law breaking. And if the US government continues to break humanitarian law in the future, then that can do nothing but create far more backlash than any single incident.

The alternative is to release the evidence and prosecute the law breakers. Make it known to future Americans that using the government’s power to commit attrocities will not be tolerated.

The “we must keep the photos secret to prevent international backlash and protect American lives” only works if you are short-sighted. It only works if you think the American Government has somehow “Learned its lesson”.

Tell me, has Dick Cheney learned his lesson? Has he had a change of heart? Has he shown regret and remorse for his hand in the torture of thousands of prisoners for years, many of whom were innocent?

I don’t think so.

In fact, it seems fairly apparent that Dick Cheney is trying to exert influence on the US government to get it to continue his lawless and inhumane methods. And Cheney isn’t the only one, just the most visible and the most cranky.

If we want to prevent international backlash and protect American lives, then we must think of the long-view of American behavior. Covering up this one attrocity and letting the criminals get away with breaking the law will only enable and encourage more law-breaking in the future, creating more attrocities, and creating more international backlash, endangering more lives.

If the Government were truly interested in saving American lives, they would publish all the photos and prosecute those who broke international law.

But the government isn’t interested in that at all. It’s interested in maintaining its power. Obama is interested in his own agenda and doesn’t want prosecutions to be a distraction. He wants to get reelected in 2012. Much lower on his priority is protecting American lives. And the neo-conservatives don’t give a damn about anything but themselves and their power. Like Cheney, they want to continue exerting their power and want nothing to be a restraint on their power, including an American public that would be aghast by their behaviour if it were revealed in the photos of their crimes.

Release the photos. Prosecute those who violated international law. Protect American lives.

Torture
War Crimes

Comments (0)

Permalink

Photos Gave us the Geneva Convention

Over on Glenn Greenwald’s blog, Daphne Eviatar points out an interesting bit of history: The reason we have the Geneva Convention of 1949 is because after WW2, the US and General Eisenhower insisted on distributing huge volumes of photos to the media showing the attrocities that happened during the war: the death camps, emaciated prisoners, corpses. These photos were so repugnant that nations around the world created a set of laws that described universal humanitarian norms, the Geneva Convention of 1949.

This is the Geneva Convention that gives us the rules on how to treat prisoners of war, rules the United States has recently broken in Iraq, Afghanistan, Cuba, and at various black sites around the world.

And there are photos of Americans violating the Geneva Convention that the US government is trying to supress. These very photos could reinforce with the American public and the world why the Geneva Convention is so important, because they would show what it really looks like when those laws are violated.

We could release these photos and remind the world why the Geneva Convention, why the treatment of human prisoners, is so important. Or we could sit on the photos and reinforce the notion that we are above the law.

Torture

Comments (0)

Permalink

Tortured Logic

Go here to demand the Attorney General investigate those who approved this tortured logic:

http://www.aclu.com/torturedlogic/

Torture
War Crimes

Comments (0)

Permalink

The Word for the Day is Torture

Glenn Greenwald writes about NPR’s Bush Apologist hack Alicia Shepard’s insistence on avoiding the term “torture” when refering to what America has done to prisoners in Abu Graihb and Guantanamo. You can read it here:

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/06/22/npr/index.html

Shepard is using classic war handwavium logic, misdescribing the physical violence America has done to its prisoners in order to downplay and minimize the severity of those actions.

It’s not “enhanced interrogation techniques”; it’s torture.

They’re not “detainees”; they’re prisoners.

It’s not the Ministry of Love… well, hopefully you get the idea.

In fact, Shepard’s doublespeak on NPR wins her Orwell’s coveted “Ministry of Truth” Award.

Congratulations, Alicia!

Ministry:Truth
Torture

Comments (0)

Permalink

The Worse We Act, The More We Need to Hide

Once again, Glenn Greenwald nails it.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/06/09/transparency/index.html

The Bush and Obama administrations both argued that we need to keep information secret, not because it qualified as a state secret, but because it was information that our government had act so horribly that our enemies would rise up and kill Americans.

Consider if during the Vietnam War that the Mai Lai incident was kept secret on these grounds. An evil act by American soldiers, suppressed because of the “hearts and minds” it would lose.

The only problem with this is that if we follow it to it’s logical conclusion, then the worse Americans act, the more the government will want the power to supress and hide the truth. The more brutal we act, the more silence we will desire.

There is no use in a government that is transparent about things everyone agrees about but hides its torture and imprisonment without due process of innocent people. It’s like saying freedom of speech is reserved for people who agree with the government, reserved for popular opinions.

The worse our government acts, the more we need Freedom of Information, the more we need transparency.

Torture

Comments (0)

Permalink

Torture Photos and Causation

American Casualties in Iraq

Obama is pushing to stop the release of torture photos. He says it’s because the photos will be a recruiting poster for terrorists and American troops in Iraq and Afghanistan will be killed.

CQPolitics has an article today (16 June 2009) that questions this claim with evidence. The Abu Ghraib photos were first seen on “60 Minutes” on 28 April 2004. The image above shows American deaths in Iraq over time. For 2004, the numbers of dead/wounded are:

January: 47/188
February: 19/150
March: 52/323
April: 136/1214
28 April 2004: Photos appear on “60 Minutes”
May: 80/757
June: 42/589
July: 54/552

The one thing these numbers show is that the number of deaths and wounded drop after the photos are released. It is doubtful that the photos caused the numbers to drop, but to say the photos caused the number of attacks to rise would first require the numbers to actually be higher from before to after, and second would require that the photos were what actually caused the rise in numbers.

Since the numbers actually fell after the photos were made public, one cannot assert that the release of photos would cause attacks to rise without disregard to the historical evidence to the contrary.

The CQ Politics article states:

Defense Department data and independent experts confirm there is no clear link between the Abu Ghraib scandal and violence in Iraq.

Drawing a connection between the Abu Ghraib photos and the lethal violence that occurred afterward in Iraq “is opinion, not analysis,” said Anthony H. Cordesman, a military expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Simpler reasons exist for why Obama does not want the photos of Americans torturing Iraqi prisoners to be released than the fabrication that it will cause more attacks. Americans might finally demand that Obama prosecute Americans who committed torture and the Bush administration people who authorized torture. And Obama has said repeatedly that he wants to “look forward, not back” on torture. He has made clear that he doesn’t want to investigate criminal activity.

And though Obama says he doesn’t want the photos released because of attacks, the facts don’t support that notion. So, it might be more accurate to say that Obama doesn’t want to release the photos so he doesn’t have to prosecute the people who committed and authorized torture.

http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000003143986&cpage=1

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iraq_casualties.htm

Iraq
Obama
Torture
War Crimes

Comments (0)

Permalink

Khalid El-Masri tortured while innocent

Khalid El-Masri was a German citizen when he was detained on 31 December 2003 by Macedonian officials because his name was on a terrorist list. American security officials, described as a “black snatch team”, renditioned El-Masri on 24 January 2004.

El-Masri alleges that they beat him, stripped him naked, drugged him, and gave him an enema. He was then dressed in a diaper and a jumpsuit, and flown to Baghdad, then immediately to “the salt pit”, a covert CIA interrogation center in Afghanistan. El-Masri states that he was beaten and sodomized while in American custody.

In March, 2004, El-Masri went on a hunger strike to demand that he be given due process. He managed to get a meeting with the prison director and a CIA officer known as “The Boss”. They conceded he should not be imprisoned but refused to release him.

28 May 2004, El-Masri was released in the middle of the night on a desolate road in Albania with no funds to get home.

December 2005, El-Masri described an account of this whole experience in the Los Angeles Times.
http://articles.latimes.com/2005/dec/18/opinion/oe-masri18

December 2005, the ACLU helps El-Masri file suit in the USA against former CIA director George Tenet and the owners of the private jets, leased to the US government, that the CIA used to transport him. May 2006, Federal District Judge T.S. Ellis, III dismissed the lawsuit, invoking the “state secrets privilege”. June 2007 the ACLU filed a petition for certiorari at the U.S. Supreme Court. October 2007, the petition was denied by the Supreme Court without comment.

The “state secret” that the government is apparently protecting? The fact that America kidnaps and tortures people.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khaled_el-Masri

Torture
War Crimes

Comments (0)

Permalink